Judiciary’s Popular Posts

Judiciary
Benefit of extended date (from September to 30th November) of Section 16(2)(c) and 16(4) has to be given retrospectively from July 2017- Kerala High Court

Benefit of extended date (from September to 30th November) of Section 16(2)(c) and 16(4) has to be given retrospectively from

Post Under: GST| Judiciary


Madras High Court directs fresh assessment due to SCN uploaded in ‘Additional Notices’ Tab in GST Portal instead of under Notices’ Tab

Madras High Court directs fresh assessment due to SCN uploaded in ‘Additional Notices’ Tab in GST Portal instead of under

Post Under: GST| Judiciary


Rejection of taxpayer's detailed reply without any justification, clearly shows non-application of mind by the officer.

Rejection of taxpayer\'s detailed reply without any justification, clearly shows non-application of mind by the officer.

Ethos limited vs. Sales tax

Post Under: GST| Judiciary


Expiry of e-way bill due to break down of vehicle is only a technical breach. Penalty cannot be imposed in the absence of any criminal intent Allahabad High Court.

Expiry of e-way bill due to break down of vehicle is only a technical breach. Penalty cannot be imposed in

Post Under: GST| Judiciary


Without Taking Any Action Against Seller And Action Taken Against Buyer To Reversal The ITC Which He Claimed Not Reflected In GSTR-2A Due To Sellers  Mistake  Is Arbitrary Calcutta High Court.

Without Taking Any Action Against Seller And Action Taken Against Buyer To Reversal The ITC Which He Claimed Not Reflected

Post Under: GST| Judiciary


Browse All Categories
GST (223)
Excise (2)
DGFT (1)
RBI (3)
SEBI (1)
Finance (20)
S.Tax (3)
ad-1
ad-2
ad-3
ad-4
ad-5

Search Posts by Date